THE USE OF CODE-SWITCHING AS A POLITENESS STRATEGY IN UZBEK-ENGLISH COMMUNICATION
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explores the use of code-switching as a politeness strategy in Uzbek-English bilingual communication. Drawing on Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory and discourse analysis, the study investigates how bilingual speakers switch between Uzbek and English to soften speech, show respect, or manage face-threatening acts. Data from natural conversations, interviews, and surveys reveal that English is often perceived as a more formal, neutral, or professional language, while Uzbek conveys intimacy and emotional directness. The findings show that code-switching is a pragmatic resource used deliberately in different social contexts to maintain harmony, avoid conflict, and express solidarity. This study contributes to the understanding of pragmalinguistic strategies in bilingual discourse and offers practical implications for language education and intercultural communication.
Article Details
Section
References
Auer, P. (1998). Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity. Routledge.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Bullock, B. E., & Toribio, A. J. (2009). The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching. Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Karimova, S. (2019). Code-switching in Uzbek-English academic discourse. Uzbek Journal of Language Studies, 5(2), 45–53.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Social motivations for codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford University Press.
Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics, 18(7–8), 581–618.
Surmanov,S. (2025). Enhancing and optimizing vocabulary retention: A self-study approach using anki.
Rakhmatullaeva, Z. (2022). Bilingual practices on Uzbek social media: A pragmalinguistic perspective. Tashkent Linguistic Review, 2(1), 22–34.